SHOOTERS' RIGHTS ASSOCIATION

For shooters and re-enactors, living history demonstrators, air soft players etc. Membership benefits include

the Shooters' Journal, advice line and £10 million VCR compliant PLI as standard for all activities 

Blog

Blog

Panorama - Monday

Posted on August 18, 2018 at 4:50 AM

Panorama - BBC One Monday 20th at 20.30 BST 'legal weapon'. This arises from RFD Paul Edmunds buying obsolete calibre revolvers in the US and selling them with homemade ammunition to the scrote community, for which he got a 30-year sentence last November. The Beeb have been sitting on this programme for months waiting for another case to hit the courts - and that case ended on Wednesday with the dealer acquitted. Edmunds was a one-off rogue dealer, judging by the number of his 'associates' to have been rolled over by the police and come up clean. The Law Commission have recommended that antique firearms should not change hands for cash - a restriction that has applied to the scrap metal trade for sometime - and the Policing and Crime Act 2017 empowered the Home Office to introduce regulations to define an antique: which they haven’t yet. That's at the heart of this: the first Firearms Act in 1920 exempted antiques from controls, subject to being possessed solely as curiosities or ornaments. These two words had been used in conjunction with each other to advertise 'Exchange and Mart' magazine (founded 1878) in other publications, so in 1920 everyone knew what they meant. The landmark prosecution was Richards v Curwen in 1977 - which acquitted him of possessing two early mark (1890s) Webley revolvers. To be an antique, the firearm has to be kept as a curiosity or ornament after which its obsolescence by age is the question of fact and degree. The court rejected the prosecution argument that the Webleys used 'modern' ammunition on the basis that using ammunition type as a definition would mean they'd never become antiques, but also said that 20th century firearms probably wouldn’t be antiques. Naturally, the Home Office ignored the Court of Appeal and continued to rely on ammunition as defining antique versus modern. The secret memorandum of guidance to police (1969) suggested that obsolete ignition systems were antiques and carried that thinking through to the published version in 1989 with advice that possession of ammunition might indicate that something wasn’t a curiosity or ornament. Then in 1992, pressured by the passage of time, came the obsolete calibre list. That caused some prosecutions: one of our members had a collection of Martini Henry rifles on the wall and one on his firearm certificate for target shooting. So when the police rolled him, he was prosecuted for all the antiques because he had ammunition. They dropped that at the court door. Most of the prosecutions I dealt with (as an expert witness) were people who kept old guns as curiosities or ornaments and the prosecution challenge was that the stuff couldn’t be antique because it took ‘modern ammunition’. Acquittals included a pre-1893 .410” shotgun, a 12 bore 1910 Greener GP, loads of black powder proofed hammer shotguns and a few really old revolvers: all predating 1900, so the acquittals were in line with Richard v Curwen and the anomaly was the prosecutions – driven by guidance to the CPS that didn’t tell them how to decide whether to prosecute or not. In 1994 R v Brown, the Court of Appeal acquitted him – he had a .22” War Office pattern rifle – and said that time had moved on and so must the definition. Bill Harriman was the defence expert in that one. Prosecutors continued to apply guidance that did not take account of case law to their decisions. I had a case in which magistrates convicted a dude of all his collection – a Luger pistol, a 19th century blank firing single shot pistol and two flare pistols. These came to him as frames only: he made the stocks, trigger and locking latch and ‘barrelled’ them with copper tube. They looked quite smart, but the obsessive prosecution ‘expert’ insisted that they were lethal barrelled weapons. We didn’t appeal, as the magistrates gave him a conditional discharge and instructed police to give me the exhibits for deactivation so that the defendant could have them back. In another case, the exhibit was a Colt New Service revolver that had been changing hands round a shooting club for the previous 20 years or so. Police traced it back to when Army and Navy stores sold it new in 1915. The officer buyer gave it to his son for WW2 and he gave it to his daughter’s boyfriend in the 1970s – as he belonged to the club. The club secretary was convicted and fined £150. That was typical in such circumstances and remained so until the 2003 Anti-social Behaviour Act brought in a mandatory five-year sentence for possession of a prohibited small firearm. Handguns were banned in the UK in 1997. That had the effect of making a defence of ‘antique’ a bigger deal, because instead of £150 fines, five years inside would be a life changing experience. Our early experience of antiques cases post 2003 was prosecutions being dropped if a robust antique status argument was put up. These mostly related to obsolete calibres that weren’t on the Home office list. That list didn’t include .320, for example until the 2003 revision and still doesn’t include .455” – the ammunition that the Richards v Curwen revolvers (1977 acquittal) took. Then attitudes hardened – we think that the Home Office needed convictions for old tat to make gun crime look as though it were on the up. Juries didn’t want to convict collectors of obsolete stuff with a five year gaol term in the offing: significant acquittals included a 1942 Lanchester submachine gun and a 1946 Inglis Browning GP35 – David Dyson was the defence expert in those cases. That got the Law Commission into paranoid overdrive and led to clauses in the Policing and Crime Act 2017. Meanwhile, Paul Edmunds was buying old revolvers in the US, making the cartridges and selling into the black market. The case against the section 5 dealer that finished Wednesday started in January 2016 with police burning the electronic locks off his driveway gates. More than thirty police vehicles convoyed in to disgorge over 100 policemen who searched the house in the presence of his young family. He had a small antiques collection and was charged with possessing them without the authority of the secretary of state (which he has) on the strength of ammunition in his armoury might be suitable for use in them. Such is the paranoid obsession that drives the Home Office. Separating firearms licensing from the police and Home Office to a competent agency is long overdue in the UK. The jury acquitted him after the traditional two-hour lunch break. So what now? We’ll have to watch the programme and see. RL

Categories: None

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

6875 Comments

Reply jordan 11
5:39 PM on September 27, 2020 
An impressive share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a bit evaluation on this. And he the truth is bought me breakfast as a result of I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I really feel strongly about it and love reading more on this topic. If potential, as you develop into expertise, would you mind updating your weblog with more details? It's extremely helpful for me. Massive thumb up for this blog submit!
jordan 11 http://www.jordan11retro.us.com
Reply lebron james shoes
5:57 PM on September 27, 2020 
Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I would like to put in writing like this moreover ?taking time and actual effort to make an excellent article?however what can I say?I procrastinate alot and in no way appear to get something done.
lebron james shoes http://www.lebronjames.us.com
Reply balenciaga sneakers
6:32 PM on September 27, 2020 
Can I just say what a aid to find someone who truly is aware of what theyre speaking about on the internet. You undoubtedly know tips on how to convey a problem to gentle and make it important. More individuals need to learn this and understand this side of the story. I cant consider youre no more in style since you definitely have the gift.
balenciaga sneakers http://www.balenciagashoes.us.com
Reply adidas yeezy
6:35 PM on September 27, 2020 
I found your blog web site on google and check a couple of of your early posts. Continue to keep up the superb operate. I just extra up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. In search of ahead to studying more from you in a while!?
adidas yeezy http://www.yeezy-shoes.us.org
Reply stone island sale
6:41 PM on September 27, 2020 
When I originally commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now every time a remark is added I get 4 emails with the identical comment. Is there any manner you can take away me from that service? Thanks!
stone island sale http://www.stoneislands.us
Reply supreme clothing
6:52 PM on September 27, 2020 
It?s arduous to search out knowledgeable people on this subject, however you sound like you know what you?re speaking about! Thanks
supreme clothing http://www.supremeoutlet.us.com
Reply retro jordans
6:57 PM on September 27, 2020 
I am usually to blogging and i really appreciate your content. The article has really peaks my interest. I'm going to bookmark your site and preserve checking for brand new information.
retro jordans http://www.jordan-retro.us.com
Reply golden goose
7:02 PM on September 27, 2020 
Good post. I study something more difficult on different blogs everyday. It'll all the time be stimulating to learn content from different writers and follow somewhat one thing from their store. I?d choose to make use of some with the content on my weblog whether you don?t mind. Natually I?ll offer you a hyperlink in your internet blog. Thanks for sharing.
golden goose http://www.goldengoosesneakers.us
Reply moncler
7:08 PM on September 27, 2020 
Can I just say what a aid to search out somebody who really is aware of what theyre talking about on the internet. You positively know tips on how to carry an issue to gentle and make it important. More people must learn this and understand this side of the story. I cant believe youre not more widespread since you positively have the gift.
moncler http://www.monclersoutletstore.com
Reply Charlesflefe
7:15 PM on September 27, 2020 
dress
Reply a bathing ape
7:34 PM on September 27, 2020 
You made some respectable factors there. I looked on the internet for the difficulty and located most people will go along with with your website.
a bathing ape http://www.bapeclothing.us.com
Reply moncler
7:39 PM on September 27, 2020 
I?m impressed, I have to say. Actually rarely do I encounter a weblog that?s both educative and entertaining, and let me let you know, you will have hit the nail on the head. Your idea is excellent; the issue is one thing that not sufficient individuals are talking intelligently about. I am very blissful that I stumbled throughout this in my seek for one thing referring to this.
moncler http://www.monclersoutletstore.com
Reply GeraldnuS
7:51 PM on September 27, 2020 
personal loans to pay off debt www.personalloans02.com upstart personal loans reviews.
casino games free online www.onlinecasinonodeposit002.com best online casino south africa.
Reply hermes belt
8:01 PM on September 27, 2020 
The subsequent time I learn a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I do know it was my option to learn, however I actually thought youd have something fascinating to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you may fix if you werent too busy on the lookout for attention.
hermes belt
Reply hermes handbags
8:07 PM on September 27, 2020 
There are definitely plenty of particulars like that to take into consideration. That could be a great level to deliver up. I supply the ideas above as common inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you deliver up where an important thing will be working in sincere good faith. I don?t know if greatest practices have emerged round things like that, however I'm certain that your job is clearly identified as a fair game. Each girls and boys feel the influence of only a second?s pleasure, for the rest of their lives.
hermes handbags http://www.hermes-handbags.us.org
Reply Ralphidelo
8:19 PM on September 27, 2020 
subprime personal loans https://personalloans02.com personal loans for unemployed.
online casino no deposit bonus no playthrough https://onlinecasinonodeposit002.com best online casino payouts.
Reply RichardSen
8:19 PM on September 27, 2020 
cheap sildenafil: http://dietkannur.org/ how much viagra should i take the first time?
viagra coupons generic viagra best over the counter viagra
Reply kobe shoes
8:23 PM on September 27, 2020 
There are some fascinating points in time in this article but I don?t know if I see all of them center to heart. There is some validity but I'll take maintain opinion till I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we want more! Added to FeedBurner as effectively
kobe shoes http://www.kobesneakers.com
Reply supreme clothing
8:25 PM on September 27, 2020 
I found your blog web site on google and verify a couple of of your early posts. Proceed to maintain up the very good operate. I just extra up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. Looking for ahead to studying more from you in a while!?
supreme clothing http://www.supremehoodies.us
Reply irving shoes
8:25 PM on September 27, 2020 
It's best to take part in a contest for one of the best blogs on the web. I'll suggest this web site!
irving shoes http://www.kyrieirving-shoes.us.com