SHOOTERS' RIGHTS ASSOCIATION

For shooters and re-enactors, living history demonstrators, air soft players etc. Membership benefits include

the Shooters' Journal, advice line and £10 million VCR compliant PLI as standard for all activities 

Blog

Blog

What a Troll

Posted on October 16, 2017 at 2:25 PM

Just a Troll On Saturday 7th October a ‘video’ got posted on the Airsoft Nation’s Facebook page in which the SRA rated a defamatory mention. What sparked things off was the launch of a new airsoft association – UKASA – United Kingdom Airsoft Site Association, which the ‘video’ author felt the irrational need to sneer at. The main source of airsoft product appears to be Taiwan. Quality, build, feel and utility have improved immensely in the past two decades since the SRA included ‘airsoft skirmish’ in their public liability insurance policy. Their usage has also broadened: classified these days as ‘Realistic Imitation Firearms’ (RIFs) by the Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006, they are photogenic enough to serve as wall hangers, set decorators, collectors’ items and in living history displays: as projectile launchers in battle re-enactment and in target shooting they feature in both the gallery-style shooting shy one might encounter at a country fair and at target shooting clubs: besides that, they get used by war-gamers in airsoft skirmish and by movie-makers as props. Home Office concerns about the public owning firearms have a long back-story, consisting largely of a series of ignorance-based knee-jerk reactions to unrelated events. Back in the 1960s, the Wilson government repealed the 1870 Gun Licensing Act, that being a tax costing more to collect than it raised. Gun owners were supposed to buy one unless they had a firearm certificate or a game licence: so clay pigeon shooters needed it and air gun owners were supposed to acquire them after Moore v Gooderham (1960) decided that low-powered air guns were firearms and not toys, as earlier held in Bryson v Gamage Ltd (1907) In the course of making that decision, plans were drawn up to introduce a shot gun certificate, that they then shelved as not worth the bother, in 1965. On 12th August 1966 three Metropolitan policemen were shot dead and the media hue and cry was for the restoration of the death penalty: suspended for an experimental five-year period the year before. The names of the murderers who escaped the rope because of that temporary (later permanent) reprieve became famous: Ronald and Reginald Kray, Myra Hindley, Ian Brady and Harry Roberts. Had they hanged, they would be as nameless and faceless as the last two men hanged in Britain in 1964. Home Secretary of the day Roy Jenkins headed off the media storm by cracking down on shotguns: the usual knee-jerk diversionary tactic that this saga will encounter again and again. The police murderers had used handguns; shotguns only featured in poaching cases, domestic homicides and suicides, and as swag in burglaries, but on the ‘do something’ mantra that politicians live day-to-day by, it was handily still near the top of the litter bin. And that would have been that, except the Home Office gave the job of issuing the certificates to the police, instead of to the Post Office that had previously issued gun licenses. Some 600,000 people applied in 1968, causing another knee-jerk reaction: this time by (Sir) John McKay, chief inspector of constabularies. He went into a frightful funk at the thought of so many people, particularly in cities, having guns, little realizing that only one in four (SRA’s estimate) of owners actually bothered applying. The police didn’t know the extent of gun ownership in the UK because it wasn’t a problem and thus wasn’t on their radar. Nevertheless, the urge to ‘do something’ was all powerful, so McKay formed a committee of his cronies and they concluded that reducing the number of firearms in the hands of the public was a desirable aim in itself. So a committee without a question to answer reached its conclusions first and then looked for ‘how’ to achieve their goal rather than letting the evidence show them the way forwards. McKay’s report was so embarrassing that it has never been published. It formed the background to a green paper in 1973 that was flushed into oblivion, along with Sir Edward Heath’s conservative government in 1974, only to re-appear as the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1988. Another knee-jerk reaction to events: in this instance the issue of a firearm certificate to an unsuitable person by a police force just going through the motions. This legislation banned semi-automatic centre-fire rifles and legitimized deactivation, thus setting the scene for subsequent knee-jerk reactions. The Home Office didn’t notice, of course. They’d swallowed the police line that reducing the number of certificates was the solution whatever the problem was thought to be and banning some guns by type should supposedly have a reducing impact on certificate numbers. The ‘increase’ in shot gun certificate numbers 1968-88 certainly reflects the increasing wealth and leisure time of the population, but was also undoubtedly driven by late take-up of the requirement by owners. It took the farming community a long time to ‘get’ that the requirement was one each (like birth certificates) as opposed to one per farm, as was the case with poisons, explosives and other such licenses as may be necessary for a working farm to work. After 1988, numbers dwindled, but that’s carborundum policing rather than the public changing its attitudes. The main effect was far more guns outside the control system than within it. Deactivation took tens of thousands of guns out of registration and since demand could not be satisfied within the licensing system, people looked to guns that didn’t have anything to do with licensing instead. Entries to the market included paintball guns, airsoft and air cartridge revolvers. The handgun ban in 1997, while putting ‘real’ handguns into the prohibited section 5 category, also released from the controls altogether captive bolt humane killers and CO2 pneumatic guns. Policy drew the bottom line power threshold far enough above paintball and airsoft for them not to get onto the Home Office radar. We’ve come a long way since the US Government decided that 59 foot pounds was the minimum for lethality. In the UK today it’s 0.7 ft. lb. In January 2003 a drive-by shooting killed two women in a burst of machine gun fire. Machine guns were prohibited in 1937, so naturally some other scapegoat had to be prohibited in the ‘knee-jerk’ ‘do-something’ world of the Home Office. Air cartridge revolvers got it that time around and three years later, airsoft came to Home Office attention. The Violent Crime Reduction Act 2006 refers to ‘realistic imitation firearms’ (RIFs) while specifically excluding deactivated formerly real guns from the definition. There had previously been public order legislation relating to imitation firearms, but the ‘problem’ was the open sale of RIFs to walk-in custom. A 1994 research paper at the Home Office had found, inter alia, that the armed robbers they interviewed in prison had often made the decision to stage a hold-up because a suitable firearms-look-a-like prop came to hand. Only two of the robbers in that study had real guns and one of them had owned his since the war and had no ammunition. All the others used imitations of one sort or another – this is the old sawn-off cucumber in a brown paper bag trick – or variations of it, and many of them didn’t show a weapon to the victims at all. So the idea was a variation on the US federal five-day waiting period for a handgun. Instead of walk-in impulse buyers being able to make a purchase and then rob next door with it, the Home Office wanted a qualifying threshold that was more than an age bar but short of a licensing system. Airsoft guns were, by then, a specialist subject: ‘real’ gunshops didn’t generally sell them. Air weapon specialist gunshops might have: the only one we were familiar with at the time didn’t and these air gun shops had to register as firearms dealers with the police and keep a register of who they sold air guns to as a result of the VCR Act. The Act lumped airsofts in with any other RIFs – replicas, 1/1 model kits etc. Regulations following the Act in 2007 suggested that public liability insurance would serve as evidence one had a defence under the Act in relation to historic re-enactments. So far as the airsoft side goes, the importers formed UKARA – the United Kingdom Airsoft Retailers Association. Under the Act, airsoft retailers need a defence to a charge of supply. In the case of historical re-enactment, that’s straightforward – the buyer produces evidence of his public liability insurance for that purpose, completes the deal and goes on his way rejoicing. But for airsoft skirmishers, the solution arrived at was registration of players. You attend a game site three times in seven weeks and the organisers register you with UKARA. Then when you turn up at a retailer, he has a defence under the Act for making a sale to you. What you’ve got as you go on your way with your purchase is a realistic imitation firearm in a public place. That has its own problems, all of which are solved by keeping what it is concealed by packaging that also prevents you having access to it in public: ‘securely covered so that it cannot be fired’ as the mantra relating to air guns puts it. There’s no offence of possession per se; the VCR Act and regulations are concerned only with transactions and that sales are limited to authorized buyers. These are persons with PLI for historic re-enactment. The Act and regulations are silent about UKARA registration, as is the Home Office website. As an aside, ‘Airsoft World’ exhibited at ‘War and Peace’ this year and when we trawled through their range of products they couldn’t produce anything that didn’t homage weapons used in past conflicts: so all airsoft skirmish is ‘historic’: sure, you can stage a futuristic scenario for a war game, such as Russians v Germany, but you’ll be doing it with weapons that all served in Afghanistan. So, back to our troll, rambling into an open microphone in a darkened bedroom somewhere in England: his problem seemed to be that joining UKASA involved paying a fee of £30. He seemed aware of UKARA, didn’t know anything about the 2007 VCR regulations and thus didn’t understand the relevance of PLI and then claimed that the SRA’s insurance policy did not exist! That can have consequences; aside from being libel, he’s sought to restrain our lawful trade, which is an offence at common law and crossed the line set in the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. He showed someone’s UKASA certificate on his ‘video’ and with that in front of him – with all our contact details thereon, failed to check anything with us. Then, to cap it off, and with our letterhead detailing our website in front of him, he put up a home page from the obsolete website that hasn’t been updated since Peter Brookesmith retired two years ago. More than 3,000 checks were successfully carried out by event organisers this year, made as SRA groups produced their PLI credentials to event organisers and English Heritage venues up and down the country, so the apparent fact that one idiot can’t manage something so simple says quite a lot about him, his methodology and the low standards of his research. He didn’t ‘get’ that there’s no lower age limit on the SRA’s PLI (after claiming it don’t exist), pointing out the 18-age limit on airsoft purchases. Yeah, right. The SRA was formed as an association for grown-ups with real guns. For a grown-up to teach shotgun shooting to a person under 15 years old, it has to be done on land occupied by the teacher, or at a registered clay-shoot. To let a junior use a shotgun on land where merely permission to do so is held, the junior needs his own shot gun certificate and there’s no lower age limit for that. Put another way, would you want to go shooting with someone who doesn’t have PLI? Seriously? That’s the gap UKASA sought to fill, simultaneously providing both buyer and seller with a defence under the VCR Act and that works with the SRA’s PLI behind them. Same as it is behind more than 500 other clubs and associations, as it has been for more than thirty years and we look forward to the next thirty, and fewer trolls. Can’t say the same about knee-jerk reactions though: there’s another one building at the time of writing. The Home Office thinks rifles chambered .50” BMG and held on firearm certificates should be prohibited and is holding a ‘consultation’ about it.

Categories: None

Post a Comment

Oops!

Oops, you forgot something.

Oops!

The words you entered did not match the given text. Please try again.

95 Comments

Reply yeezy shoes
8:39 PM on September 10, 2020 
Hey! I just wish to give an enormous thumbs up for the good info you've gotten right here on this post. I can be coming back to your weblog for more soon.
yeezy shoes http://www.yeezysshoes.us.com
Reply curry 6
2:22 AM on September 13, 2020 
There are some attention-grabbing closing dates in this article but I don?t know if I see all of them heart to heart. There is some validity however I'll take hold opinion until I look into it further. Good article , thanks and we would like extra! Added to FeedBurner as properly
curry 6 http://www.curry6.net
Reply bape clothing
11:03 AM on September 13, 2020 
The following time I learn a weblog, I hope that it doesnt disappoint me as much as this one. I mean, I do know it was my choice to read, but I really thought youd have something interesting to say. All I hear is a bunch of whining about something that you could possibly fix if you happen to werent too busy on the lookout for attention.
bape clothing http://www.bape-clothing.us
Reply supreme
6:00 PM on September 17, 2020 
This really answered my downside, thank you!
supreme http://www.supremeclothings.com
Reply hermes bag
8:14 PM on September 17, 2020 
This is the suitable blog for anyone who wants to find out about this topic. You realize a lot its nearly exhausting to argue with you (not that I truly would want?HaHa). You definitely put a new spin on a topic thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, just nice!
hermes bag http://www.hermes-handbags.us.com
Reply longchamp
10:43 PM on September 19, 2020 
You made some first rate factors there. I seemed on the web for the problem and located most people will associate with with your website.
longchamp http://www.long-champ.us.com
Reply hermes
6:01 AM on September 20, 2020 
WONDERFUL Post.thanks for share..extra wait .. ?
hermes http://www.hermes-handbags.us.org
Reply bape hoodie
11:58 AM on September 22, 2020 
I used to be very pleased to seek out this internet-site.I needed to thanks to your time for this glorious learn!! I undoubtedly having fun with every little bit of it and I've you bookmarked to check out new stuff you weblog post.
bape hoodie http://www.bape-hoodie.us.com
Reply jordan 1 off white
7:29 AM on September 24, 2020 
Howdy! I simply would like to give an enormous thumbs up for the good info you've right here on this post. I can be coming again to your weblog for extra soon.
jordan 1 off white http://www.offwhitexjordan1.com
Reply calvin klein outlet
2:43 PM on September 24, 2020 
Aw, this was a very nice post. In idea I wish to put in writing like this additionally ?taking time and precise effort to make a very good article?however what can I say?I procrastinate alot and by no means seem to get something done.
calvin klein outlet http://www.calvinkleinoutlet.us.com
Reply jordans
3:22 PM on September 26, 2020 
You made some respectable points there. I seemed on the web for the difficulty and located most people will associate with along with your website.
jordans http://www.jordanssneakers.us.com
Reply supreme new york
5:33 PM on September 26, 2020 
Oh my goodness! an amazing article dude. Thank you Nevertheless I am experiencing challenge with ur rss . Don?t know why Unable to subscribe to it. Is there anyone getting equivalent rss problem? Anyone who knows kindly respond. Thnkx
supreme new york http://www.supreme-newyork.us.com
Reply outlet golden goose
12:58 PM on September 28, 2020 
After I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new comments are added- checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get four emails with the identical comment. Is there any manner you possibly can remove me from that service? Thanks!
outlet golden goose http://www.goldengoosesneakers.us
Reply jordan shoes
3:29 PM on September 28, 2020 
A formidable share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing a little evaluation on this. And he actually bought me breakfast as a result of I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! But yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love reading extra on this topic. If possible, as you change into experience, would you mind updating your weblog with more details? It is extremely helpful for me. Massive thumb up for this blog submit!
jordan shoes http://www.air-jordanshoes.us.org
Reply kyrie 6
4:24 AM on September 30, 2020 
very nice publish, i definitely love this web site, carry on it
kyrie 6 http://www.kyrie6shoes.us
Reply lebron 16
8:16 AM on September 30, 2020 
It?s laborious to seek out educated individuals on this matter, however you sound like you recognize what you?re talking about! Thanks
lebron 16 http://www.lebron16.us
Reply Yeezy Shoes
3:56 PM on October 1, 2020 
http://www.airmax97.us.com/ Air Max 97 http://www.max270.us.com/ Nike Air Max 270 http://www.supplyyeezy.us.com/ Yeezy Supply http://www.kobebryant-jersey.us/ Kobe Bryant Jersey http://www.kobebryantjerseysforsale.us/ Kobe Bryant Jerseys For Sale http://www.kobebryantjersey24.us/ Kobe Bryant Jersey 24 http://www.kobebryantwebsiteofficial.us/ Kobe Bryant Website Official http://www.yeezy-shoe.us.com/ Yeezy http://www.yeezymafia.us.com/ Yeezy http://www.nikes.us.com/ Nike Shoes http://www.nikeshoes.us.org/ Nike Shoes http://www.nfl-jerseys.us.org/ NFL Jerseys http://www.yeezyboost350.us.com/ Yeezy Boost 350 http://www.yeezy380.us/ Yeezy 380 http://www.yeezy380.us.com/ Yeezy 380 http://www.humanraces.us.com/ Human Races http://www.humanracesshoes.us/ Human Race Shoes http://www.basketball-jerseys.us.com/ Basketball Jerseys http://www.jerseysbasketball.us/ Basketball Jerseys http://www.jerseys-nba.us/ Cheap NBA Jerseys http://www.nikes-shoes.us.com/ Nike Outlet http://www.yeezy-shoe.us.com/ Yeezy Shoes http://www.yeezymafia.us.com/ Yeezy Mafia http://www.yeezy350v2.us/ Yeezy 350 V2 http://www.yeezysofficialsite.us/ Yeezys Official Site http://www.yeezyslides.us/ Yeezy sliders http://www.jerseys-nba.us.com/ NBA Jerseys http://www.jerseysnba.us.com/ NBA Jerseys http://www.airjordan-1.us/ Air Jordan 1 http://www.airjordan1.us.com/ Air Jordan 1 http://www.jordan-1.us.com/ Jordan 1 http://www.jordan1s.us.com/ Jordan 1s http://www.jordan1s.us/ Jordan 1s http://www.retrojordan.us.com/ Jordan Retro http://www.jordanretro4.us.com/ Jordan Retro 4 http://www.jordan4-retro.us/ Jordan 4 Retro http://www.jordansshoess.us.com/ Jordans Shoes http://www.jordan4s.us/ Jordan 4s http://www.diorjordan1.us/ Dior Jordan 1 http://www.airjordan1mid.us/ Air Jordan 1 Mid http://www.jordan11concord.us/ Jordan 11 Concord http://www.jordan11retro.us/ Jordan 11 Retro http://www.jordan1low.us/ Jordan 1 Low http://www.jordan11s.us/ Jordan 11s http://www.jordanaj1.us/ Jordan AJ 1 http://www.nbastores.us/ NBA Store http://www.nbaoutletstore.us/ NBA Store http://www.yeezystore.us.com/ Yeezy http://www.yeezyssneakers.us.com/ Yeezy Sneaker http://www.adidasyeezyofficialwebsite.com/ Adidas Yeezy Official Website http://www.adidasyeezyonlinestore.us/ Adidas Yeezy Online Store http://www.airmaxclearancesale.us/ Air Max Clearance Sale http://www.nflshopofficialonlinestore.com/ NFL Shop Official Online Store http://www.nikeuk.uk.com/ Nike UK http://www.adidasyeezy.uk.com/ Adidas Yeezy http://www.yeezy.uk.com/ Yeezy http://www.yeezy350.uk.com/ Yeezy 350 ***
Yeezy Shoes http://www.yeezy-shoe.us.com/
Reply cheap jordans
7:06 AM on October 2, 2020 
A powerful share, I just given this onto a colleague who was doing somewhat analysis on this. And he in actual fact purchased me breakfast because I discovered it for him.. smile. So let me reword that: Thnx for the treat! However yeah Thnkx for spending the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love studying more on this topic. If potential, as you become expertise, would you thoughts updating your blog with more details? It's highly useful for me. Large thumb up for this blog post!
cheap jordans http://www.cheapjordans.us.com
Reply Dior Jordan 1
9:35 AM on October 2, 2020 
Reply yeezys
1:49 PM on October 2, 2020 
An fascinating discussion is price comment. I think that it is best to write more on this topic, it won't be a taboo subject however typically persons are not sufficient to talk on such topics. To the next. Cheers
yeezys http://www.yeezyshoes.in.net